CopyPastor

Detecting plagiarism made easy.

Score: 1; Reported for: Exact paragraph match Open both answers

Possible Plagiarism

Plagiarized on 2020-10-24
by Ishaan Kapoor

Original Post

Original - Posted on 2013-06-07
by Aya



            
Present in both answers; Present only in the new answer; Present only in the old answer;

Project Structure:
p1 |- x1 | |- __init__.py | |- x1_module1.py |- x2 |- __init__.py |- x2_module1.py
Please try this.
import sys import os PACKAGE_PARENT = '..' SCRIPT_DIR = os.path.dirname(os.path.realpath(os.path.join(os.getcwd(), os.path.expanduser(__file__)))) sys.path.append(os.path.normpath(os.path.join(SCRIPT_DIR, PACKAGE_PARENT))) from x1.x1_module import tempfunction
It worked for me.🤗
> unfortunately, this module needs to be inside the package, and it also > needs to be runnable as a script, sometimes. Any idea how I could > achieve that?
It's quite common to have a layout like this...
main.py mypackage/ __init__.py mymodule.py myothermodule.py
...with a `mymodule.py` like this...
#!/usr/bin/env python3
# Exported function def as_int(a): return int(a) # Test function for module def _test(): assert as_int('1') == 1 if __name__ == '__main__': _test()
...a `myothermodule.py` like this...
#!/usr/bin/env python3
from .mymodule import as_int
# Exported function def add(a, b): return as_int(a) + as_int(b) # Test function for module def _test(): assert add('1', '1') == 2 if __name__ == '__main__': _test()
...and a `main.py` like this...
#!/usr/bin/env python3
from mypackage.myothermodule import add def main(): print(add('1', '1'))
if __name__ == '__main__': main()
...which works fine when you run `main.py` or `mypackage/mymodule.py`, but fails with `mypackage/myothermodule.py`, due to the relative import...
from .mymodule import as_int
The way you're supposed to run it is...
python3 -m mypackage.myothermodule
...but it's somewhat verbose, and doesn't mix well with a shebang line like `#!/usr/bin/env python3`.
The simplest fix for this case, assuming the name `mymodule` is globally unique, would be to avoid using relative imports, and just use...
from mymodule import as_int
...although, if it's not unique, or your package structure is more complex, you'll need to include the directory containing your package directory in `PYTHONPATH`, and do it like this...
from mypackage.mymodule import as_int
...or if you want it to work "out of the box", you can frob the `PYTHONPATH` in code first with this...
import sys import os PACKAGE_PARENT = '..' SCRIPT_DIR = os.path.dirname(os.path.realpath(os.path.join(os.getcwd(), os.path.expanduser(__file__)))) sys.path.append(os.path.normpath(os.path.join(SCRIPT_DIR, PACKAGE_PARENT)))
from mypackage.mymodule import as_int
It's kind of a pain, but there's a clue as to why in [an email][1] written by a certain Guido van Rossum...
> I'm -1 on this and on any other proposed twiddlings of the `__main__` > machinery. The only use case seems to be running scripts that happen > to be living inside a module's directory, which I've always seen as an > antipattern. To make me change my mind you'd have to convince me that > it isn't.
Whether running scripts inside a package is an antipattern or not is subjective, but personally I find it really useful in a package I have which contains some custom wxPython widgets, so I can run the script for any of the source files to display a `wx.Frame` containing only that widget for testing purposes.
[1]: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-3000/2007-April/006793.html

        
Present in both answers; Present only in the new answer; Present only in the old answer;